India, Maharashtra, vijay kumbhar, News, Governance, RTI, Transparency, Civic Issues, Real Estate: Maharashtra Government
Showing posts with label Maharashtra Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Maharashtra Government. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Maharashtra Government invites consent of SIC applicants as per amended rules of RTI

The Government of Maharashtra has now invited consent as per the amended rules of RTI from the applicants who have already applied for the post of State information commissioners. The general administration department (GAD) had invited applications from candidates for the three posts in Nashik, Pune and Nagpur benches of the State Information Commission (SIC) in June 2019. Accordingly, some have applied for the post of SIC. The state government had also appointed a search committee to shortlist the names of the candidates to be sent to the appointment committee





However, meanwhile, the rules pertaining to Right to Information (Term of Office, Salaries, Allowances and Other Terms and Conditions of Service of the Information Commissioners) were amended. And the entire process of appointment of SICs stopped.

Now the government of Maharashtra has asked all the applicants to furnish the consent letter in the following format as per amended rules.

1. According to the advertisement dated 7th June 2019, I have applied for the post of State Information Commissioner in Maharashtra State Information Commission.

2. Right to Information (Term of Office, Salaries, Allowances and Other Terms and Conditions of Service of the Chief Information Commissioner, Information Commissioners in the Central Information Commission, State Chief Information Commissioner and State Information Commissioners in the State Information Commission) Rules, 2019. Notification on this subject has been published by the Central Government on October 24, 2019. As per the notification dated 24.10.2019, the Central Government has modified the salary, allowances, term of office and other terms and conditions of service of the State Chief Information Commissioner and State Information Commissioners in the State Information Commission.

3. I have taken note of these changes and I agree to maintain the application made and will impress for the post of State Information Commissioner.

The candidates have to send a letter mentioning “Willingness for the post of State Information Commissioner" superscribed on the envelope to Secretary (O&M), General Administration Department, 1st Floor, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032 as well as through e-mail to sic-application@gov.in within 15 days from the date of publication of advertisement.

The advertisement in this regard is yet to be published in the newspapers. If the government publishes this advertisement in next 3-4 days it will receive consent letters by 15th March. Then the Search Committee will follow objective criteria for shortlisting of applicants and prepare a panel of such short-listed candidates, along with the criteria applied. It will take suppose month or so i.e. 15th April.  And after that, the same shall be notified on the website for the appropriate time. Say about a month or so i.e. 15th May.

Then the short-listed the panel shall thereafter be placed for consideration by the Committee led by the chief minister and this committee make its recommendations to the Governor. It will take say another month. That means if all goes well SIC’s will be appointed by the June end in Maharashtra.

Subscribe for Free

To receive free emails or free RSS feeds, please, subscribe to Vijay Kumbhar's Exclusive News & Analysis
                   
RTI KATTA is a platform to empower oneself through discussions amongst each other to solve their problems by using Right to Information act, Every Sunday at Chittaranjan Watika, Model Colony,Shivaji nagar, Pune, between 9.30 to 10.30 A.M.

RTI Resource Person, RTI Columnist
Phone – 9923299199

Website –  http://vijaykumbhar.com _
                  https://vijaykumbhar-hindi.blogspot.com/
                  https://vijaykumbhar.blogspot.com/
                  http://surajya.org/
Email    –  admin@vijaykumbhar.com
                  kvijay14@gmail.com






Monday, December 10, 2018

Maha Govt allows inspection of files under RTI , here are some guidelines for officers and citizens

To reduce number of applications under Right to Information Act (RTI) and to bring transparency in functioning of official works Pune Municipal Corporation ( PMC) had started ‘open day’ in 2009. Under this scheme every Monday between 3.00 to 5.00 PM all the documents of every department are made available for inspection to citizens. On the same line Government of Maharashtra has started open day in all district and subordinate offices. The GR regarding this effect has been issued on 26 November 2018.





Though now Maharashtra government has started ‘open day’ in district and subordinate levels journey to it was not easy. Convincing government officials about proactive disclosure was huge task. However, I had privilege to talk to discuss various sections of RTI with late Prakash Kardalay. The former Editor of Indian express pune . He played crucial role in formation of RTI act. People used to call him ‘ masterjee ‘.

One day we were discussing section 4 of RTI act. When I drew his attention to explanation given to section 4 (3) and (4) of the act. This explanation clearly says that dissemination of information under section 4 includes inspection of offices of any public authority. We both were curious about how to implement ‘inspection of office of public authority. As per our discussion next day I went to Pune municipal corporation to inspect the files .

In PMC I demanded a file to inspect. The file was regarding TDR (Transferable Development Rights), which comes under 4 (a) of RTI. Initially I went to concerned Public Information Officer (PIO) and asked for that file.  The PIO demanded a application. I denied and told him that information disclosed under 4(a) of RTI was public one and as it was already published there was no need of application. Then he told me that the file I was demanding was under police investigation. I told him that how can you conceal the information that was already published, or required to be published under RTI ? .  Then there were lot of arguments and counter arguments. Finally, he confessed that they had not published anything under 4(a) of RTI. My argument was whether you publish it or not it has become public information on 12th October that is when RTI came to an existence. However, he didn’t show me the file and thus first attempt of inspection of office under section 4 of RTI act was failed.

Then we decided to give this exercise a legal format. We prepared an intimation format for inspection. ( This was not an application under section section 6 of RTI).Draft of that intimation is reproduced below.




Then finally after lot of augments and counter arguments and after consultation with legal department PMC allowed me inspection of office and showed files related to TDR. Then we campaigned in various offices for disclosure under section 4 of RTI act.

Then a meeting with then state information commissioner Vijay Kuvalekar was organised in PMC. Along with kuvalekar, then PMC commissioner Mahesh Zagade, City engineer Prashant Waghmare and 40 other officers were present for this meeting. I was also Part of that meeting. As per discussion in this meeting PMC started open day. since then Files are being made available to the citizens without any formal application.


The English translation of the circular issued by then Municipal Commissioner for open day is reproduced here.

                                      Municipal Commissioner Office

                                              Pune Municipal Corporation

                                              OW No. MA/MAJ/427

                                              Date - 16/07/2009
                       
Office Circular

Subject: making records available for citizens of Pune Municipal Corporation.  
        
Under the Right to Information Act 2005, information is sought from many citizens in Pune Municipal Corporation. As per law it is mandatory to give this information within one month. However, in most cases, the information is delayed or partially provided. This is very inappropriate. Due to this, there is an increase in the number of appeals and inconvenience is caused to the citizens and they are compelled to visit corporation office to obtain the information.

Transparency is the main object of the above law. It is necessary to provide all the requested information accurately and quickly to the citizens. To achieve this all employees are required to work pro-actively. The following procedures should be implemented for this.

on every Monday or in case of holiday next working day the records of all departments should be made available to citizens for inspection between 3 pm to 5 pm. At this time all the concerned officers / employees of all the departments must be present in the office. If the citizen wants a copy of the documents, then after application and payment of the necessary fee’s documents should be provided. The information regarding this procedure should be displayed prominently in every office.

All Heads of every department are required to implement above procedure in their respective offices.
Mahesh Zagade
Municipal Commissioner
Pune Municipal Corporation





For implementation of open day rules need to be formed. Accordingly, city engineer Prashant Waghmare issued a circular. In this circular responsibilities and precautions while implementation of open day are mentioned. English Translation of this circular id reproduced here

                                       City Engineer's Office
                          Pune Municipal Corporation
                          OW No. 1265
                          Date - 19/07/2009
Office Circular

Subject: making records available for citizens of Pune Municipal Corporation.
Reference - The official circular issued by the municipal commissioner, Municipal Corporation, No. MA / NJA / 427 dated 16/7/2009

As per above referred circular it has been ordered to make available official records for inspection to citizens on every Monday or in case of holiday next working day between 3 to 5 PM. Accordingly following procedure need to be adopted
  1. Every public information officer must maintain a separate register for it. In this register, it is necessary to mention the serial number, date, the name and address of the citizen, the subject of the record requested for the inspection, the documents sought, total pages, the fees charged for documents, the signature of the citizen, etc.
  2. While inspection only  the applicant and the representative of concerned office should be present.
3.   The identity of citizen should be checked before inspection i.e PAN card, passport, bank passbook, voter ID card, ration card etc.
  1. While inspection Blade, scissors, bag, pen, camera, erasers are not allowed
  2. Representative of the concerned office should take precautions so that there should not be any changes in documents while inspection
6.   If the applicant asks for copies of the documents after inspection, then the challan of charges should be given and the copies of the documents should be made available immediately after the payment is made.
7.   On the last Monday of every month or in case of holiday the holiday, the next working day will be observed as 'Right to Information Day'. On this  day if the information under the Central Right to Information Act, 2005 has not been given, then it should be complied with. It is also necessary for all the public information officers to keep an separate register for it also
8.   Every Public information officer should submit monthly report above procedure to this office
9.   This procedure should be adopted from 1st august 2009

Prashant Waghmare
City Engineer
Pune Municipal Corporation

Though Government has started open day the experience regarding inspection of office is not much satisfactory in various offices. Often they give excuse that concerned file is with some other department. While it is not mandatory to write a letter to request inspection of files it is nice to be courteous and give them prior intimation.

There are certain things to be remembered while inspection of files. As These files belongs to citizens and citizens are owners of these files they should not to feel awkward, guilty or hesitate to demand file for inspection.


Remember, once citizen give them intimation, they should not have to wait for a reply from the officer. Simply because, a citizen has a right to inspect files during designated working hours of the public authority. The intimation is just for convenience purpose and to avoid excuses by officials.

Once citizens have gone through the documents they can ask for the copies of the inspected documents. To obtain this copies one need not give application under section 6 of the RTI act. Mere giving a list of document on plain paper is enough. However, they need to pay fees required for photocopying.


VERY IMPORTANT NOTE: Intimation of inspection under Section 4 should be addressed to the top authority of the government department (meaning the municipal commissioner, if it is a municipal corporation) unlike an application under Section 6 which is addressed to the public information officer (PIO).
                      Draft Of intimation
To,
The Head of The Department

Subject – Intimation for inspection of files related to  xxxxxxxxxx

Dear Mr.Head of the Department

As per circular sankirn2018/ pra.kra. 45/ karya 6, dated 26/11/2018 the Government of Maharashtra has allowed inspection of files in every department. Please note that as per section 4 of RTI act and as per the said circular there is no need to give any intimation for inspection of files in any public authority. However, being responsible citizens, we thought it preferable to intimate you beforehand.

I intend to exercise my right as a citizen to inspect documents related to xxxxxx. I will visit your office on Monday xx/xx/2018.

Thanking you
With Regards

Subscribe for Free


To receive free emails or free RSS feeds, please, subscribe to Vijay Kumbhar's Exclusive News & Analysis
                   
RTI KATTA is a platform to empower oneself through discussions amongst each other to solve their problems by using Right to Information act, Every Sunday at Chittaranjan Watika, Model Colony,Shivaji nagar, Pune, between 9.30 to 10.30 A.M.

RTI Resource Person, RTI Columnist
Phone – 9923299199

                  https://vijaykumbhar-hindi.blogspot.com/
                  https://vijaykumbhar.blogspot.com/
                   http://surajya.org/
Email     –   admin@vijaykumbhar.com
                     kvijay14@gmail.com


Monday, June 27, 2016

Henceforth citizens have to route all their grievances and complaints through police only

Henceforth to get their grievances and complaints resolved citizens will have to route those through police. To make administration people friendly, to take cognizance of citizens complaints, to resolve these in time and to treat the citizens with respect and as well to prevent false /misleading / baseless complaints / complainants and also to redress citizens genuine complaints, the Maharashtra  Government has introduced 'One more' circular.


Looking at the language used in that circular it seems that it is applicable to all the complaints related to all the government departments. As well, as per the provisions of the circular, it appears that instead of resolving citizens complaints police will like to do citizens counseling with 'their style'. Hence it is likely that not many citizens will come forward to file complaints. Such circulars never get implemented because accountability of  it is never been fixed. Hence whether implemented or not nobody cares.

Governments all over India keep issuing numerous circulars. They are the same everywhere. Never implemented. It becomes a case of “you tell me the person and I shall tell you the circular”, thus putting into action only those circulars, which benefit the officers or their cronies. Others are thrown in the waste paper basket and none feels bad or sad about it. The circulars are cleverly drafted. If some issue is to be evaded, then the choice of words is so 'creative' as to abash even a litterateur. Perhaps these circulars would pass off as pieces of excellent literary talent.

Latest circular is not an exception to that. The language used in that circular is really nice. It is said that the circular has been introduced to make administration people friendly , to take cognizance of citizens complaints, to resolve these in time and to treat the citizens with respect . Similarly, it has come to government's notice that some elements with bad tendencies are filing false and misleading complaints. Such (false and misleading) complaints cause adverse effects on government’s  resources and on the morale of the officers and staff. Hence to prevent false /misleading / baseless complaints / complainants and also to redress citizens genuine complaints,

As per this circular responsibility of resolving all the complaints has been put on police shoulders. however, the real problem is police does not have proper infrastructure , staff, and resources to handle such complaints. already if complaints are related to other departments police are reluctant to register those. Especially in a case of complaints related to the revenue department police advice citizen to go to courts. In addition circular expects that to remain themselves updated (e.g. government resolutions, court orders etc.) assistant police commissioner / police superintendents are supposed to seminars / discussions / workshops.

The circular expects citizens to submit their complaints to assistant police commissioner / police superintendent by hand, via post (speed post/ registered post, ordinary mail), e-mail. After receiving such complaints, it is mandatory to register the complaint in the inward register same day. It is the responsibility of the assistant police commissioner/police superintendent to resolve these complaints. to resolve complaints police are advised to adopt following procedure.

1) Counseling

2) Give written order for primary inquiry to the concerned police station according to the complaint

3) Give order to police station to take action in case of factual complaint

4) An assistant police commissioner / police superintendent to make a report of action taken on complaint pointwise and give a copy to complainant

 5) It is mandatory to give action taken report on his/her complaint to the complainant within three weeks

6) The list of cases / complaints on which assistant police commissioner / police superintendent fail to give action taken report to the complainant within three weeks, the additional commissioner/ Inspector general of police will call it from concerned and submit it to the additional chief secretary (home) on the 5th day of every month. Additional chief secretary (home) will direct additional commissioner/ Inspector general of police to take action on such pending complaints.

7) If any complaint remains pending more than three months, applicant /complainant should submit such complaints to deputy secretary (pol 11,12,13) Mantralay after bringing such complaint to the notice of Additional Chief Secretary (Home) and act as per his directions.

8) Although it is the responsibility of assistant police commissioner / police superintendent to give action taken report on his/her complaint to the complainant within three weeks, the complainant should initially visit the concerned police station to get his/her written complaint resolved.

9) In a case of frequent complainants, after verifying the points in the complaint, a report only on points those were not resolved earlier should be prepared and given to the applicant. The points on which earlier action had been taken should be communicated to applicant, as well counseling of applicant should be done

10) In rural areas, most of the cases like quarrels, fights, and similar criminal cases take place because of revenue matters. Complaints in revenue, as well as criminal matter, occur assistant police commissioner / police superintendent should contact deputy collector. The assistant police commissioner / police superintendent after visiting deputy collector every 15 days / as early as possible and discuss the matter case wise. The points discussed or decided should be included in the report.

11) To counsel the complainants properly It is necessary that assistant police commissioner / police superintendent should remain themselves updated (e.g. government resolutions, court orders etc.). Hence Inspector general of police should organize seminars / discussions / workshops for assistant police commissioners / police superintendents.



Related Stories

Literary geniuses of Mantralaya, a case of wasted talents



Subscribe for Free
To receive free emails or free RSS feeds, please, subscribe to Vijay Kumbhar's Exclusive News & Analysis


RTI KATTA is a platform to empower oneself through discussions amongst each other to solve their problems by using Right to Information act, Every Sunday at Chittaranjan Watika, Model Colony,Shivaji nagar, Pune, between 9.30 to 10.30 A.M.


RTI Resource Person, RTI Columnist
Phone – 9923299199
Website – http://surajya.org/

Monday, September 7, 2015

Maharashtra circular on sedition makes politicians and public servants “self proclaimed Government”

The bureaucracy in Maharashtra has once again put government in embarrassing position. It had left no stone unturned to be more powerfully than lawfully elected government. And unfortunately elected representatives have also succumbed to their wits. The blame game on governments circular on sedition has started .Oppositions have questioned intentions of government behind this circular, while Chief Minister of Maharashtra Devendra Fadnavis has placed the responsibility for the circular on the former Congress-NCP government.


Photo Courtsey pratimview.blogspot.in
CM has clarified that the circular is a direct translation of an HC decision. And that was based on the previous government's affidavit in the High Court. He has also termed media’s interpretation as “laughable” . However scenario is very different, the circular is not direct translation but twisted translation of original act and what had been put in The High Court on affidavit.

Out of 5 points only first 2 points of this circular are under criticism. In 1st  point words “लोकसेवक व सरकारचे प्रतिनिधी” means “ public servants and representatives of Government” have been mischievously inserted and that has caused the entire controversy .

In original act the words used in section 124A are “Whoever, by words, either spoken
or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life”

In the affidavit place in order state government has submitted that it would send guideline to police personal to take precaution while imposing section 124A . And 1st point of this affidavit reads  “The words, signs or representations must bring the Government (Central or State) into hatred or contempt or must cause or attempt to cause disaffection, enmity or disloyalty to the Government and the words/signs/ representation must also be an incitement to violence or must be intended or tend to create public disorder or a reasonable apprehension of public disorder;”


Photo Courtsey limenlemony.files.wordpress.com
If we read care carefully in original act or in an affidavit placed in High Court words “लोकसेवक व सरकारचे प्रतिनिधी” means “public servants and representatives of Government” were not there. However in circular while translating,  these words seem to have been inserted. Point 1 of this circular reads “तोंडी किंवा लेखी शब्दांद्वारे अथवा खुणांद्वारे, अगर दृश्य अथवा अन्य मार्गामार्फत केंद्र अथवा राज्य सरकार, लोकसेवक व सरकारचे प्रतिनिधी यांच्याबद्दल द्वेष, तुच्छता, अप्रीती, अवमान, असंतोष, शत्रुत्व, द्रोहभावना अथवा बेइमानी याची भावना दर्शवित असली पाहिजे. अशा प्रकारचे शब्द,खुणा किंवा प्रदर्शन अभिव्यक्ती हिंसाचारास प्रवृत्त करणारी किंवा जनतेत असंतोष निर्माण करणारी असली पाहिजे”.

Who and why the inserted words “public servants and representatives of Government” is matter of investigation. However this can be termed as an attempt to amend law by issuing circular.

 The next point of this circular is connected with point no 1. In Marathi it says’ सदर लेखी किंवा तोंडी शब्द, खुणा अथवा कोणत्याही प्रकारची अभिव्यक्ती यामधून राजकारणी अथवा लोकसेवक हे शासनाचे प्रतिनिधी असल्याचे ध्वनित होईल, त्यावेळीच सदर कलम लावण्यात यावे. That means “said (above mentioned) words/signs/representations show politicians or public servants as representative of the Government then only above section should be applied”. Actually in 1st point word “politician” is not there but suddenly it appears in 2nd point of Marathi translation.


Photo Courtsey whatoneearth.in
In affidavit filed in high court point no 2 is “Words, signs or representations against politicians or public servants by themselves do not fall in this category unless the words/signs/ representations show them as representative of the Government”. This point actually exempts from any immunity for politician and public servants from section 124 A. however Marathi translation not only provides such immunity it puts ‘freedom of speech and expression” in danger.

Point no 5 of this circular and affidavit placed in High Court is the only hope to assume that this will not be misused it says’ Before applying section 124A district law officer should be consulted and then within tow weeks Advocate generals opinion should sought.”. Fortunately in circular also same words have been kept untouched. Hence it is very difficult for police personal to apply section 124A  to any one without Advocate Generals opinion.

However major question who did this mischief and why? It is not the first instance that bureaucracy has done such mischief. The most recent examples are.

1) It attempted to amend CrPC 156, With this amendment courts would not be able direct Police to file FIR without the sanction of the competent authority. This was clear attempt to shield both government servants as well as elected members. This would have made it harder to  make accountable government servants and public representatives

2) In Maharashtra Right to public Services Act (MRTPS) they have eliminated all other fields except Governance from the Right to Public services Commissioners that are to be appointed under MRTPS. Section 13 (5) . It says the chief commissioner or commissioners shall be the persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in administration in government or public authority. That means there will be only babus as  CICs and ICs of commission
Photo Courtsey www.manjul.com

3) Under MRTPS imposition amount of  a penalty  has left to be specified by the State Government from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette. This is the trick to kill the act before its inception. If penalty provision is not fixed in the act itself, babus will time and again try to minimize or remove it completely by mere notifications.

4) To make public servants accountable government of Maharashtra introduced Delay in Discharge of Official Duties Act, 2005’, PoDiDoODA however bureaucracy never allowed to implement it properly. The funniest part is that the rules for PoDiDoODA came in to force in November 2013 i.e. after seven years of its promulgation. Hence, citizen’s charter was not implemented in many departments. And even after rules were framed the act was not implemented.


5) Many circulars were issued from Mantralay of Maharashtra since 1996 to express commitment to eradicate corruption and illegalities. Right to Information (RTI) Act was introduced soon afterwards. There was a provision for stringent action against illegalities exposed through the use of RTI. So far, 13 circulars have been issued for action against those involved in corruption and illegalities. But till today no action has been taken against any public servant according to these circulars.

In short bureaucracy has always tried to keep upper hand on democracy and unfortunate thing is elected representatives succumbed to their (Bureaucrats) wits for reason best known to them only.

Related Stories






Subscribe for Free

To receive free emails or free RSS feeds, please, subscribe to Vijay Kumbhar's Exclusive News & Analysis


RTI KATTA is a platform to empower oneself through discussions amongst each other to solve their problems by using Right to Information act, Every Sunday at Chittaranjan Watika, Model Colony,Shivaji nagar, Pune, between 9.30 to 10.30 A.M.


RTI Resource Person, RTI Columnist
Phone – 9923299199
Email – kvijay14@gmail.com
Website – http://surajya.org              

   



Saturday, September 5, 2015

Why is there so much Hue and cry over , Maharashtra Government’s guidelines on sedition charges ?

“Maharashtra curbs criticism ofpoliticians”, “Anti-democracy guidelines on Section 124 IPC by Maharashtra government”, “You risk sedition charges for criticising politicians”, “Criticisinggovernment can be sedition in Maharashtra now’ , “fresh guidelines on sedition; draws Opposition flak”, “Criticise government, face sedition charges in Maharashtra”, Thus were the headlines on Maharashtra government’s fresh guidelines on IPC 124 .

Photo Courtsey https://whennoodlesdream.files.wordpress.com
Reaction on this guidelines were very serious and with full of anger. I was also not exception for that. My first reaction on Facebook was also same. However careful reading of government resolution issued in this regard and High Court order shows that there is nothing much in that GR.  Actually with this GR government has asked police to take adequate precaution before applying sedition charges on anyone.

These guidelines on IPC 124-Ahave been issued with regard to the assurance given to the Bombay High Court in the cartoonist Aseem Trivedi for his cartoons during the India Against Corruption movement headed by Anna Hazare. Aseem Trivedi was arrested by Mumbai Police in 2012 for drawing cartoons that allegedly insulted the national emblem and Parliament. The assurance was given in the HC when sedition charges were dropped against him.

Reproduced here are points in GR

(i) The words, signs or representations must bring the  Central or State Government into hatred or contempt or must cause or attempt to cause disaffection, enmity or disloyalty to the Government and the words/signs/ representation must also be an incitement to violence or must be intended or tend to create public disorder or a reasonable apprehension of public disorder;

(ii) Words, signs or representations against politicians or public servants by themselves do not fall in this category unless the words/signs/representations show them as representative of the Government

Photo Courtsey truthdive.com
(iii) Comments expressing disapproval or criticism of the Government with a view to obtaining a change of government by lawful means without any of the above are not seditious under Section 124A;

(iv) Obscenity or vulgarity by itself should not be taken into account as a factor or consideration for deciding whether a case falls within the purview of Section 124A of
IPC,

(v) A legal opinion in writing which gives reasons addressing the aforesaid must be obtained from Law Officer of the District followed within two weeks by a legal opinion in writing from Public Prosecutor of the State.

Then why there is so much hue and cry about this GR?. Reason is simple. People strongly believe that literary genius in Mantralay i.e. bureaucrats issue circulars only to harass citizens or to protect their colleagues. It becomes a case of “you tell me the person and I shall tell you the circular”, thus putting into action only those circulars, which benefit the officers or their cronies. These circulars are always cleverly drafted. If some issue is to be evaded or to be framed, then the choice of words is so 'creative' as to abash even a litterateur. Perhaps these circulars would pass off as pieces of excellent literary talent.

Photo courtesy  http://www.binayaksen.net


There can be a debate on validity of section 124 (A) in democracy. British colonial government felt the need to include this provision to suppress the liberty of the citizen India. How this section can be valid in Government OF the People, BY the People, FOR the People. But that apart. What wrong government of Maharashtra has done in this case? It has just sent guidelines while invoking section 124 (a) of IPC. The government has also clarified that the GR is not a government order and is only an advisory, which can be accepted or not.

Actually these guidelines are sent to avoid application of IPC 124 (A) . However it is the drafting of these guidelines that has caused entire debacle. Literary geniuses in Mantralay have once again succeeded in spreading confusion and doubt in peoples mind.


Related Stories



Subscribe for Free
To receive free emails or free RSS feeds, please, subscribe to Vijay Kumbhar's Exclusive News & Analysis


RTI KATTA is a platform to empower oneself through discussions amongst each other to solve their problems by using Right to Information act, Every Sunday at Chittaranjan Watika, Model Colony,Shivaji nagar, Pune, between 9.30 to 10.30 A.M.


RTI Resource Person, RTI Columnist
Phone – 9923299199
Email – kvijay14@gmail.com
Website – http://surajya.org